Provisional Program for the Antiproton Workshop NAMES OF persons imply a short opening talk and leadership of a group discussion Tuesday morning: 9:00 David Hertzog: Opening of pbar part of workshop Short overview on physics topics. David Peaslee (Maryland) Short overview about beam situation at AGS and options for the future David Urner General detector issues Physics Topics 9:45 Klaus Rohrich (Julich) Hyperon-Antihyperon mainly above 2 GeV 10:45 Coffee 11:10 Billy Bonner (Rice) pbar p -> Lbar - L(1405) and radiative decays; competitive with CEBAF? 12:30 Lunch 1:45 Ted Barnes (Oak Ridge) Topics on exotic spectroscopy David Hertzog (Illinois) Search for the X(2230) using the existing D6 beamline Curtis Meyer (CMU)* (not confirmed) Anihilation in flight. 4:00 Coffee / Colloq follows Wednesday May 15. 9:00 David Peaslee / Y.Y.Lee* (YY not yet confirmed) Scheme for using the ags booster to store and deliver antiprotons Gerry Smith (PSU) Interest in the ultra-low-energy antiprotons -- trapping, antihydrogen formation, CPT tests. 10:45 Coffee 11:10 Kam Seth (Northwestern) Extracting the J/Psi - Nucleon cross section by forming J/Psi on resonance in a variety of nuclear targets 12:30 Lunch 1:45 Phil Pile (BNL) a) The D6 beamline b) Possibilities for a new 1-5 GeV/c pbar beam line Jaap Doornbos (TRIUMF) RF separated beams Slava Derbenev Specific ideas for an electron cooler for an antiproton ring 15:30 Coffee 16:00 Joint meeting with Nefken's working group on possible use of the Crystal Ball for antiproton experiments Thursday May 16. 9:00 Kam Seth * (not yet confirmed) Where are we so far on the physics discussion? David Urner (Illinois) Some ideas about possible detector(s) This should lead to a discussion about a detector(s) which could be used for all (most) of the proposed experiments 10:45 Coffee 11:10 Continuation and finaly: David Hertzog (Illinois) Putting this deversity together -- what sells and what it costs Preparing our summary for the overall workshop (all of us) May I ask from all the speakers and proponents of experiments to think about the following points, and to point them out in there talks: number of pbar's needed (not including detector acceptance!) why must it be a pbar experiment and nothing else? Exists a minimum setup which would already generate interesting physical results? are there special requirements to the beam-line (momentum resolution..)